Rini, R. Social media disinformation and security threats to democratic legitimacy (Canadian NATO Association, 2019); https://natoassociation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/NATO-publication-.pdf
Raz, J. morality of freedom (Clarendon Press, 1986).
Tattersall, A. The Power of Coalitions: Strong Unions and Strategies for Social Change (Routledge, 2020).
The science of lasers, DMJ, and other fake news. science 3591094–1096 (2018).
Starbird, K., Arif, A. & Wilson, T. Disinformation as collaboration: Uncovering the participatory nature of strategic information operations. Procedure ACM Hmm. Calculate. To interact. 31–127 (2019).
Bail, C. Breaking through the social media prism: How to reduce platform polarization (Princeton University Press, 2021).
Salerno, JM & Peter-Hagene, LC The interaction of anger and disgust on moral anger and judgment. Psychol. Science. twenty four2069–2078 (2013).
Hite, J. Affective Science Handbook (Davidson, R.J. et al.) 852–870 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
Brady, WJ, Crockett, MJ & Van Bavel, JJ The MAD model of moral contagion: The role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moral content online. perspective. Psychol. Science. 15978–1010 (2020).
Spring, V.L., Cameron, C.D. & Cikara, M. The good side of anger. Trends Cognition Science. twenty two1067–1069 (2018).
WJ Brady & MJ Crockett How effective is online anger? Trends Cognition Science. twenty three79–80 (2019).
Lengel, RH & Daft, RL Communication Media Selection as an Executive Skill. Acad. management. perspective. 2225–232 (1988).
Weisband, S. & Atwater, L. Evaluations of self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 84632–639 (1999).
Byron, K. Are you carrying too much baggage? Communicating emotions and misunderstandings through email. Acad. management.pastor 33309–327 (2008).
Walther, JB & D’Addario, KP The influence of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social science. Calculate.pastor 19324–347 (2001).
Brady, WJ, McLoughlin, K., Doan, TN & Crockett, M. How social learning amplifies the expression of moral outrage in online social networks. Science.advanced 7eabe5641 (2021).
Brady, W.J. et al. Algorithm-mediated social learning in online social networks.preprint in OSF preprint. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yw5ah (2023).
Brady, WJ & Van Bavel, JJ Social identity shapes the antecedents and functional consequences of moral emotion expression in online networks.preprint in OSF preprint https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/dgt6u (2021).
Jordan, JJ & Rand, DG Notifying when no one is looking: Explaining reputation heuristics for anger and punishment in one-shot anonymous interactions. J. Personal. social psychology. 11857 (2019).
Jordan, J.J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P., Rand, D.G. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature 530473–476 (2016).
Crockett, M.J. Moral Insurrection in the Digital Age. nut. ham. behavior. 1769–771 (2017).
Brady, WJ, Wills, JA, Jost, JT, Tucker, JA & Van Bavel, JJ Emotions shape the spread of moral content in social networks. National Academy of Procedures. Science.united states of america 1147313–7318 (2017).
DeGroot, MH Reaching consensus. It gets crowded.Associate Professor of Statistics 69118–121 (1974).
Goldenberg, A., Weisz, E., Sweeny, TD, Cikara, M. & Gross, JJ The emotion amplification effect of crowds. Psychol. Science. 32437–450 (2021).
McClain, C. 70% of US social media users never or rarely post or share about political or social issues (Pew Research Center, 2021); https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/04/70-of-us-social-media-users-never-or-rarely-post-or- share-about-political-social-issues/
Duggan, M. & Smith, A. Political environment on social media (Pew Research Center, 2016); https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/
Huszár, F. et al. Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter. National Academy of Procedures. Science.united states of america 119e2025334119 (2022).
Chakradhar, S. Internal documents detail how Facebook’s algorithms prioritized outrage and the posts that triggered it. (Nieman Lab, 2021); https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/10/more-internal-documents-show-how-facebooks-algorithm-prioritized-anger-and-posts-that-triggered-it/
Chowdhury, R. Exploring algorithmic amplification of political content on Twitter. twitter https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2021/rml-politicalcontent (2021).
Shamir, J. & Shamir, M. Pluralistic ignorance across issues and over time: Information cues and bias. Public opinion. Q. 61227–260 (1997).
Prosecutor Prentice, Prosecutor Miller Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: The impact of misperceptions of social norms. J. Pers. social psychology. 64243–256 (1993).
Leeds, J.M. & Chikara, M. Understanding and addressing misperceived polarization. fill. Trance. R.Soc.B 37620200143 (2020).
Wilson, AE, Parker, VA, Feinberg, M. Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. car. opinion. behavior. Science. 34223–228 (2020).
Levendusky MS and Malhotra N. (Mis)perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public opinion. Q. 80378–391 (2016).
Enders, AM and Armaly, MT Differential effects of actual and perceived polarization. Polite. behavior. 41815–839 (2019).
Ronson, J. So you were publicly humiliated. (Penguin, 2015).
Peters, K. & Kashima, Y. A multimodal theory of emotional diffusion. Psychol. Bull. 141966–992 (2015).
Lerman, K., Yan, X., Wu, X.-Z. “Majority illusion” in social networks. PLoS ONE 11e0147617 (2016).
Alipourfard, N., Nettasinghe, B., Abeliuk, A., Krishnamurthy, V. & Lerman, K. Friendship paradoxes bias perceptions in directed networks. nut. common. 11707 (2020).
Schöne, JP, Parkinson, B. & Goldenberg, A. Negative emotions are more prevalent than positive emotions on Twitter after both positive and negative political situations. Affect. Science. 2379–390 (2021).
Kuran, T. Preference falsification, policy continuity, and collective conservatism. Ecocon. J. 97642–665 (1987).
Noelle-Neumann, E. The spiral of silence is a theory of public opinion. J. commune. twenty four43–51 (1974).
Hampton, K., Rainey, L., Dwyer, M., Singh, I., Purcell, K. Social media and the “spiral of silence” (Pew Research Center, 2014); https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/
Lees, J. & Cikara, M. Inaccurate group metaperceptions lead to negative outgroup attributions in competitive environments. nut. ham. behavior. Four279–286 (2020).
Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Hertwig, R., Lewandowsky, S. & Herzog, SM Public attitudes toward algorithmic personalization and the use of personal data online: Evidence from Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. . Humanit. Social science. common. 8117 (2021).
Rader, E. Exploring user surprise as a symptom of algorithmic filtering. internal. J. Ham. Calculate. stud. 9872–88 (2017).
Berlo, D.K. The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1960).
Guess, A., Munger, K., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. How accurate are your social media and politics survey responses? Polite. common. 36241–258 (2019).