Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lee, J.-Y. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 553–672 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Lam, R. et al. Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting. Science 382, 1416–1421 (2023).
Google Scholar
Price, I. et al. GenCast: diffusion-based ensemble forecasting for medium-range weather. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.15796 (2023).
Monteleoni, C. et al. in Computational Intelligent Data Analysis for Sustainable Development (eds Yu, T. et al.) 81–126 (CRC Press, 2013).
Rolnick, D. et al. Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 42 (2022).
Gentine, P., Eyring, V. & Beucler, T. in Deep Learning for the Parametrization of Subgrid Processes in Climate Models (Camps-Valls, G. et al.) Ch. 21, 307–314. (John Wiley & Sons, 2021).
Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019).
Google Scholar
Eyring, V., Gentine, P., Camps-Valls, G., Lawrence, D. M. & Reichstein, M. AI-empowered next-generation multiscale climate modelling for mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01527-w (2024).
Watson-Parris, D. et al. ClimateBench v1. 0: A benchmark for data-driven climate projections. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002954 (2022).
Yu, S. et al. ClimSim: an open large-scale dataset for training high-resolution physics emulators in hybrid multi-scale climate simulators. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.08754 (2023).
Beucler, T. et al. Climate-invariant machine learning. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj7250 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wu, D. et al. Quantifying uncertainty in deep spatiotemporal forecasting. In Proc. 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1841–1851 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).
McGovern, A. et al. Making the black box more transparent: understanding the physical implications of machine learning. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 2175–2199 (2019).
Google Scholar
Runge, J., Gerhardus, A., Varando, G., Eyring, V. & Camps-Valls, G. Causal inference for time series. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 10, 2553 (2023).
Iglesias-Suarez, F. et al. Causally-informed deep learning to improve climate models and projections. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 129, 2023–039202 (2024).
Google Scholar
Eyring, V. et al. Reflections and projections on a decade of climate science. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 279–285 (2021).
Google Scholar
Eyring, V. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 423–552 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Stevens, B. et al. DYAMOND: the DYnamics of the Atmospheric general circulation Modeled On Non-hydrostatic Domains. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 6, 61 (2019).
Gentine, P., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Reinaudi, G. & Yacalis, G. Could machine learning break the convection parameterization deadlock? Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 5742–5751 (2018).
Google Scholar
Grundner, A. et al. Deep learning based cloud cover parameterization for ICON. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, 2021–002959 (2022).
Google Scholar
Behrens, G. et al. Improving atmospheric processes in earth system models with deep learning ensembles and stochastic parameterizations. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.03079 (2024).
Bretherton, C. S. et al. Correcting coarse-grid weather and climate models by machine learning from global storm-resolving simulations. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002794 (2022).
Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S. & Gentine, P. Deep learning to represent sub-grid processes in climate models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9684–9689 (2018).
Google Scholar
Brenowitz, N. D. et al. Machine learning climate model dynamics: offline versus online performance. In NeurIPS 2020 Workshop on Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning (2020).
Beucler, T. et al. Enforcing analytic constraints in neural networks emulating physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 98302 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, R., Walters, R. & Yu, R. Incorporating symmetry into deep dynamics models for improved generalization. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.03061 (2020).
Rasp, S. Coupled online learning as a way to tackle instabilities and biases in neural network parameterizations: general algorithms and Lorenz 96 case study (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 2185–2196 (2020).
Google Scholar
Grundner, A., Beucler, T., Gentine, P. & Eyring, V. Data-driven equation discovery of a cloud cover parameterization. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 16, 2023–003763 (2024).
Google Scholar
Camps-Valls, G. et al. Discovering causal relations and equations from data. Phys. Rep. 1044, 1–68 (2023).
Google Scholar
Couldrey, M. P. et al. What causes the spread of model projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change in response to greenhouse gas forcing? Clim. Dyn. 56, 155–187 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zanna, L. & Bolton, T. Data-driven equation discovery of ocean mesoscale closures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088376 (2020).
Zhang, C. et al. Implementation and evaluation of a machine learned mesoscale eddy parameterization into a numerical ocean circulation model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2023MS003697 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guillaumin, A. P. & Zanna, L. Stochastic-deep learning parameterization of ocean momentum forcing. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 13, e2021MS002534 (2021).
Bolton, T. & Zanna, L. Applications of deep learning to ocean data inference and subgrid parameterization. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 376–399 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ross, A., Li, Z., Perezhogin, P., Fernandez-Granda, C. & Zanna, L. Benchmarking of machine learning ocean subgrid parameterizations in an idealized model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2022MS003258 (2023).
Google Scholar
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5301–5369 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dagon, K., Sanderson, B. M., Fisher, R. A. & Lawrence, D. M. A machine learning approach to emulation and biophysical parameter estimation with the Community Land Model, version 5. Adv. Stat. Climatol. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 6, 223–244 (2020).
Google Scholar
Humphrey, V. et al. Soil moisture–atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability. Nature 592, 65–69 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shen, C. et al. Differentiable modelling to unify machine learning and physical models for geosciences. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 552–567 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, W. L. et al. Physics-constrained machine learning of evapotranspiration. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 14496–14507 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yang, T. et al. Evaluation and machine learning improvement of global hydrological model-based flood simulations. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 114027 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, N., Zhang, D., Chang, H. & Li, H. Deep learning of subsurface flow via theory-guided neural network. J. Hydrol. 584, 124700 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kraft, B., Jung, M., Körner, M., Koirala, S. & Reichstein, M. Towards hybrid modeling of the global hydrological cycle. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 26, 1579–1614 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xie, K. et al. Physics-guided deep learning for rainfall-runoff modeling by considering extreme events and monotonic relationships. J. Hydrol. 603, 127043 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nathaniel, J., Liu, J. & Gentine, P. MetaFlux: meta-learning global carbon fluxes from sparse spatiotemporal observations. Sci. Data 10, 440 (2023).
Peherstorfer, B., Willcox, K. & Gunzburger, M. Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization. SIAM Rev. 60, 550–591 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cutajar, K., Pullin, M., Damianou, A., Lawrence, N. & González, J. Deep Gaussian processes for multi-fidelity modeling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.07320 (2019).
Delaunay, A. & Christensen, H. M. Interpretable deep learning for probabilistic MJO prediction. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, 2022–098566 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kurth, T. et al. FourCastNet: accelerating global high-resolution weather forecasting using adaptive Fourier neural operators. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2208.05419 (2022).
Beusch, L., Gudmundsson, L. & Seneviratne, S. I. Emulating Earth system model temperatures with MESMER: from global mean temperature trajectories to grid-point-level realizations on land. Earth Syst. Dyn. 11, 139–159 (2020).
Google Scholar
Doury, A., Somot, S., Gadat, S., Ribes, A. & Corre, L. Regional climate model emulator based on deep learning: concept and first evaluation of a novel hybrid downscaling approach. Clim. Dyn. 60, 1751–1779 (2023).
Google Scholar
Quilcaille, Y., Gudmundsson, L., Beusch, L., Hauser, M. & Seneviratne, S. I. Showcasing MESMER-X: spatially resolved emulation of annual maximum temperatures of earth system models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, 2022–099012 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ham, Y.-G., Kim, J.-H. & Luo, J.-J. Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts. Nature 573, 568–572 (2019).
Google Scholar
Immorlano, F. et al. Transferring climate change knowledge. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.14780 (2023).
IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson Delmotte, V. et al.) 3–32 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
O’Brien, T. A. et al. Increases in future AR count and size: overview of the ARTMIP tier 2 CMIP5/6 experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 127, e2021JD036013 (2022).
Kurth, T. et al. Exascale deep learning for climate analytics. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1810.01993 (2018).
Salcedo-Sanz, S. et al. Analysis, characterization, prediction, and attribution of extreme atmospheric events with machine learning and deep learning techniques: a review. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 155, 1–44 (2024).
Google Scholar
O’Brien, T. A. et al. Detection of atmospheric rivers with inline uncertainty quantification: TECA-BARD v1.0.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 6131–6148 (2020).
Google Scholar
Prabhat, K. et al. ClimateNet: an expert-labeled open dataset and deep learning architecture for enabling high-precision analyses of extreme weather. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 107–124 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Application of deep convolutional neural networks for detecting extreme weather in climate datasets. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.01156 (2016).
Muszynski, G., Kashinath, K., Kurlin, V. & Wehner, M. Topological data analysis and machine learning for recognizing atmospheric river patterns in large climate datasets. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 613–628 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kim, S. et al. Deep-Hurricane-Tracker: tracking and forecasting extreme climate events. In 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision 1761–1769 (IEEE, 2019).
Molina, M. J. et al. A review of recent and emerging machine learning applications for climate variability and weather phenomena. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-22-0086.1 (2023).
Google Scholar
Molina, M. J., Gagne, D. J. & Prein, A. F. A benchmark to test generalization capabilities of deep learning methods to classify severe convective storms in a changing climate. Earth Space Sci. 8, e2020EA001490 (2021).
Vandal, T., Kodra, E. & Ganguly, A. R. Intercomparison of machine learning methods for statistical downscaling: the case of daily and extreme precipitation. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 137, 557–570 (2018).
Google Scholar
Miloshevich, G., Cozian, B., Abry, P., Borgnat, P. & Bouchet, F. Probabilistic forecasts of extreme heatwaves using convolutional neural networks in a regime of lack of data. Physical Review Fluids 8, 040501 (2023).
Prodhan, F. A. et al. Projection of future drought and its impact on simulated crop yield over South Asia using ensemble machine learning approach. Sci. Total Environ. 807, 151029 (2022).
Google Scholar
Eyring, V. et al. Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3383–3438 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dijkstra, H., Hernandez-Garcia, E., Masoller, C. & Barreiro, M. Networks in Climate (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Google Scholar
Karmouche, S. et al. Regime-oriented causal model evaluation of Atlantic–Pacific teleconnections in CMIP6. Earth Syst. Dyn. 14, 309–344 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nowack, P., Runge, J., Eyring, V. & Haigh, J. D. Causal networks for climate model evaluation and constrained projections. Nature Commun. 11, 1415 (2020).
Barnes, E. A., Barnes, R. J., Martin, Z. K. & Rader, J. K. This looks like that there: interpretable neural networks for image tasks when location matters. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 1, e220001 (2022).
Schlund, M. et al. Constraining uncertainty in projected gross primary production with machine learning. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 125, e2019JG005619 (2020).
Mooers, G. et al. Comparing storm resolving models and climates via unsupervised machine learning. Sci. Rep. 13, 22365 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Gomez, I., McGovern, A., Agrawal, S. & Hickey, J. Global extreme heat forecasting using neural weather models. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 2, 220035 (2023).
Boulaguiem, Y., Zscheischler, J., Vignotto, E., van der Wiel, K. & Engelke, S. Modeling and simulating spatial extremes by combining extreme value theory with generative adversarial networks. Environ. Data Sci. 1, 5 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jiang, C. et al. MeshfreeFlowNet: a physics-constrained deep continuous space-time super-resolution framework. In Proc. International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (IEEE, 2020).
Kendall, A. & Gal, Y. What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.04977 (2017).
Gal, Y. & Ghahramani, Z. Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In Proc. 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Balcan, M. F. & Weinberger, K. Q.) 1050–1059 (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2016).
Fort, S., Hu, H. & Lakshminarayanan, B. Deep ensembles: a loss landscape perspective. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.02757 (2019).
Osband, I., Blundell, C., Pritzel, A. & Van Roy, B. Deep exploration via bootstrapped DQN. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Lee, D. et al.) Vol. 29 (Curran Associates, 2016).
Kingma, D. P. & Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114 (2013).
Cachay, S. R., Zhao, B., Joren, H. & Yu, R. DYffusion: a dynamics-informed diffusion model for spatiotemporal forecasting. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.01984 (2023).
Hall, D. et al. NVIDIA’s Earth-2: an interactive digital twin of the Earth and its subsystems. In XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (2023); https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3980
van Straaten, C., Whan, K., Coumou, D., van den Hurk, B. & Schmeits, M. Using explainable machine learning forecasts to discover subseasonal drivers of high summer temperatures in Western and Central Europe. Mon. Weather Rev. 150, 1115–1134 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mamalakis, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I. & Barnes, E. A. in xxAI – Beyond Explainable AI (eds Holzinger, A. et al.) 315–339 (Springer, 2022).
Rader, J. K., Barnes, E. A., Ebert-Uphoff, I. & Anderson, C. Detection of forced change within combined climate fields using explainable neural networks. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002941 (2022).
Toms, B. A., Barnes, E. A. & Hurrell, J. W. Assessing decadal predictability in an earth-system model using explainable neural networks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL093842 (2021).
Mamalakis, A., Barnes, E. A. & Ebert-Uphoff, I. Carefully choose the baseline: lessons learned from applying XAI attribution methods for regression tasks in geoscience. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 2, 220058 (2023).
Rudin, C. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 206–215 (2019).
Google Scholar
McGraw, M. C. & Barnes, E. A. Memory matters: a case for granger causality in climate variability studies. J. Clim. 31, 3289–3300 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bauer, P., Stevens, B. & Hazeleger, W. A digital twin of Earth for the green transition. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 80–83 (2021).
Google Scholar
Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins (National Academies Press, 2024).
Nguyen, T., Brandstetter, E. J., Kapoor, A., Gupta, J. K. & Grover, A. ClimaX: a foundation model for weather and climate. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2301.10343 (2023).
Bonev, B. et al. Spherical Fourier neural operators: learning stable dynamics on the sphere. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.03838 (2023).
Mardani, M. et al. Residual diffusion modeling for km-scale atmospheric downscaling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.15214 (2023).
Brenowitz, N. D. et al. A practical probabilistic benchmark for AI weather models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.15305 (2023).
Nevo, S. et al. Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 26, 4013–4032 (2022).
Google Scholar